QUOTE (Skyshadow @ Nov 19 2009, 03:35 PM)

Lincecum isn't just a good pitcher, he reliably puts in the sort of dominant performances that draw everybody's attention. He brings the heat and routinely makes very good batters look stupid and manages to eek out wins even without having the sort of bats behind him that Carpenter had.
Lincecum is exciting to watch and dominant. That's what gets you the Cy Young.
Carpenter puts up the same kind of performances.
............Waino.........................Carp.............................Weedm
an
Mar/Apr 5GS 3W 0L 2.76ERA .. 2GS 1W 0L
0.00ERA .. 5GS W2 L1 3.16ERA
May ..... 6GS 2W 3L 3.80ERA .. 3GS 2W 0L
0.95ERA .. 5GS W2 L0 2.91ERA
June .... 5GS 3W 2L 3.82ERA .. 6GS 2W 3L 3.67ERA .. 6GS W4 L1
1.48ERAJuly ..... 6GS 4W 1L
1.17ERA .. 5GS 4W 0L 1.75ERA .. 5GS W3 L1 2.08ERA
Aug ..... 6GS 4W 1L
1.30ERA .. 6GS 5W 0L 2.20ERA .. 6GS W2 L1 2.42ERA
Sep/Oct 6GS 3W 1L 3.38ERA .. 6GS 3W 1L
2.41ERA .. 6GS W2 L3 3.38ERA
1st Half 19GS 10W 5L 3.04ERA . 13GS 7W 3L 2.47ERA . 18GS 10W 2L
2.33ERA2nd Half 15GS 9W 3L 2.10ERA .. 15GS 10W 1L
2.06ERA . 14GS 5W 5L 2.67ERA
Carp.. 28GS 17W
4L 7HR 38BB 144K 192IP
1.01WHIP .226BAA
2.24ERAWaino 34GS
19W 8L 17HR 66BB 212K
233IP 1.21WHIP .244BAA 2.63ERA
Weedy 32GS 15W 7L 10HR 68BB 261K 225IP 1.05WHIP
.206BAA 2.48ERA
Carp only had
3G of 4R or more, amazing
9G of 0R, 20G of 2R or less.
Waino had 7G of 4R or more, 6G of 0R, amazing
27G of 2R or less.
Weedy had 5G of 4R or more, 8G of 0R, 21G of 2R or less.
Sure he doesn't K people, but that's not what wins a Cy Young (if that was the case, the Cy Young would be pointless). Carpenter never has been a K pitcher and it's won him one before anyways.
And the run support? Pujols was really the only bat we had until the end of July. And even then, the Cardinals bats magically went away in September (and coincidentally, so did our hitting coach at the end of the season.) Remember this game?...
http://mlb.mlb.com/mlb/gameday/index.jsp?g...1&mode=wrapThe story of the Cardinals bullpen all season long.
All I'm saying is Carpenter was better then Lincecum in a lot of the important categories. All while missing a handful of starts. Carpenter also was almost unhittable in the latter half of the season.
Lincecum won because he's all flashy with his fancy strikeouts and let's all pity him because he's not on a good team. And also because some ESPN guy and some other no-name, left Carpenter off their ballot completely. Instead, they voted for Haren and Vasquez. Please!
I may sound a little defensive about this whole ordeal, but darn it, I need something to brag about and take away from this very discouraging Cardinals season!
I guess Milton Bradley's going to win the NL MVP next week according to these voters!