QUOTE (VoiceofReason @ Nov 9 2009, 06:00 PM)

Probably the biggest indictment you can make about a Head Coach, and his coaching staff. Especially with a young team, you would expect to see several, if not many, players notiecable improve from the previous season. Who has? Sitton? That's the only and I mean ONLY guy I can think of. Maybe Finley too, if he can come back and stay healthy.
Everyone else is the same, or has even regressed (Colledge for example.) When you have a roster full of young layers, they should actually get BETTER right? Or is that a crazy notion?
Problem is, to be fair to MM, it's not clear how many of these guys just are not very good football players- and that would fall back on TT. But look at Barbe, Giacomini. Jackson, Nelson, Thompson, Montgomery...you can go on and on. Keep hearing about promise, and nothing evr comes to fruition. This roster is littered with way too many guys who contribute little or nothing.
I'd agree with Flynn, and add Havner. I think Nelson was looking pretty decent before the injury. I don't know about Sitton. Didn't really see him last year. But he doesn't really appear to be all that special going from a supposed rookie
phenom to what he is now.
Not sure I'd agree with you on "everyone else is the same". It appears to me that far more players look worse this year than in the past. There seems to be more evidence by position groups.
OL- regressing
WR- regressing
TE- improving
QB- probably good arguement either way. Flynn is better, Brohm isn't much better. Rogers is making more bad decisions than he should, but playing pretty well
RB- regressing (It's understandable that Grant could only improve after injuy and hold out last year, but BJ and DW have clearly regressed)
DL- improving
LB- Hard to judge as a group. Some individuals are excelling, some have been stagnant. Improvement in results overall
DB- regressing
ST- hard to believe it could regress from last year
I think Barbe and Giocomini make good fodder for comparison. Giocomini looks slow and clumsy to me, and Barbre is supposed to be this freakish athlete for an OL, but you sure can't tell it by his performance. Both were basically drafted as projects. One a transitioned TE, the other from a small school.
It's not even just the regression from last year or previous years, but a lot of these groups and individuals look worse from week to week.
To me, it appears overwhelmingly like poor coaching. Even with adequate coaching there would be development of one or two players from poor drafting. I think the drafting is probably no worse than just mediocre. More mediocre at some positions than others, but the player development is far below mediocre.