It was a decent win. We gained more experience with the big play, closing out games, and the cost of not capitalizing on turnovers. We should've won that game 50 to 17. Sadly we didn't, because of some poor line play in the first quarter. The same line play led to a multitude of second and longs that we have to eliminate to become a great offense. Aaron Kampman demonstrated that he can rush (and hurt) the passer in the new defense. Outside of that, I don't believe he or Brady Poppinga had a good day. And Aaron Rodgers showed that his game is mistake-free football. Although I have some doubts that he can actually continue that for an entire season.
http://www.greenbaypressgazette.com/articl...amp;located=rss
Our offense scored 36 points because of the big play. Donald Driver and Greg Jennings provide some spectacular highlights. What I'd rather see, though, is 36 points generated by the small play. Going on to the field and knowing that we're going to gain, at least, 4 yards every play. That would be a truly great offense. The maddening thing is, we have the talent to do it! How can we get there? That's a topic for debate. Unlike the play of OLB Aaron Kampman. Or is it?
http://gnb.scout.com/2/903907.html
From my perspective there are two reasons why we have given up so many rushing yards the past two weeks. Their names are Poppinga and Kampman. Don't get me wrong. Kampman made some decent plays. But he is missing too often on one simple task: setting the edge. Stopping the run in the 3-4 is an easy job. If the defensive line is doing their job, and they are doing their job, it is up to the outside linebackers to stop the running back. If they control the offensive tackle, or tight end, then the ball carrier is funneled inside for the mack and buck backers to take care of. That is not happening. Too many times we're relying on Charles Woodson, Tramon Williams, and Al Harris to stop the runner. It is going to be a long year if our outside linebackers continue to get pushed around. Rodgers' play could lead to a long year as well, because history tells us everything returns to the mean.
http://www.jsonline.com/sports/packers/62288042.html
In 2007 two quarterbacks had seasons that just, don't, happen. Tom Brady is the obvious one. 50 touchdowns, eight interceptions, and a 68.9% completion rate? Are you serious? Obviously Rodgers is not quite on pace to match that, although I believe he could be. The other quarterback is looking much more Aaron-like. David Garrard completed 64% of his passes and threw 18 touchdowns, to just 3 three interceptions. According to footballoutsiders.com these are the two best seasons by a quarterback in the past 20 years. Are we in for that kind of a season? There is a stat that Aaron Rodgers is over half way to completing after just three games that it took David Garrard an entire season to accomplish. Times sacked. In 2007 Garrard was sacked only 21 times. Rodgers has been sacked 12 times as of Sunday. Everyone needs to be extremely cautious about Rodgers and his play. 2007 was an abnormal year. If we were to mess with physics and play that season 100 times, 99 times Brady and Garrard would not accomplish their feats. More than likely Rodgers has some interceptions and turnovers coming his way. I simply hope it's not this coming game.
