QUOTE (Gregg @ Sep 22 2009, 11:44 PM)

Make no mistake, this shows some real bad contingency planning on TT's part.
It is hard to believe that there was no pure back up LT on the roster. But now, there is none on the practice squad either.
So if Colledge goes down, what is the plan? Lang? Giacomini? Are you serious?
And if Colledge is the long term answer for Clifton, then TT is a mediocre GM, at best. Because Colledge will never be anything more than average there, if that.
To think, he could have had Jared Geathers for a number four.
Gregg, I'm not following your logic here. The contingency plan was Colledge as Cliffy's backup and Meredith as the developmental prospect on the PS. Colledge did OK when that plan had to be enacted before.
We spent a draft pick on a pure LT, who was seen as good value in the 5th round. Why would a fourth rounder be a different approach?
Dane Randolph was signed to the PS to replace Meredith. Another raw guy.
I don't think Colledge is a LT because he doesn't project well there with his measurables. MM has said time and time again that they see Colledge as a guard. So, I don't think the Packer see his as a long-term LT solution. I agree we will be in huge trouble if Colledge goes down. Hopefully Cliffy isn't out long.
One last thing - I feel really, really, really bad for Spitz. He keeps getting moved around. I thought that MM had said they would not shuffle, and figured Spitz would stay at C and Lang will fill in for Colledge who moved over. Why get worse at three spots than two??? MM is starting to wear thin on me...