Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Trade opinion
PackerChatters > PackerChatters > Fantasy Sports
maxman44
I get: Brady, D. Williams & Royal

I give: Rivers, Benson & Fitzgerald

Would ya?
Jeremy
Without knowing your lineup it's a bit tough, but on the surface it looks good for you. Brady is a big upgrade. D'Williams and Fitzgerald probably have around equal value. You lose a little depth with Benson, but he's nothing special.

pkrjones
If I were in that situation I'd pull-the-trigger. With a healthy(er) LT I don't think Rivers does as well as last year, and I think Brady will have a good/great year. Always scary to trade-away Fitz, but as a package I think you win.
JASIII
I'm gonna say no way. Rivers is a darned good fantasy QB. I've had him the past couple years and he always puts up good numbers, very consistent . Until the 4th quarter last week, Brady and the Pats offense didn't impress me much. Fitzgerald is clearly better than Royal. I can see why you want to get rid of Benson, but overall I think you'd be giving up too much.
Vots
QUOTE (Heatseeker @ Sep 18 2009, 03:19 PM) *
12 man league. Go back and see my other post. Picking first in a 12 man league basically sucks. Yeah, you get one awesome guy, but I had to wait 24 picks before I could pick again and that's when I snatched up a QB and Megatron as literally EVERYONE picked running backs early on.


What's your roster look like?

If you have good WR depth, I'd be inclined to accept it. Brady at worse will put up the same numbers as Rivers, but Brady also has tremendous upside. So you win that swap.

Williams is without question better then Benson. So you win that swap.

The question becomes, what does your WR depth look like? That's what I want to know.
adrenaline
Without knowing the rest of the team like a few above its hard to give a concrete answer.

Brady > rivers

Fitz<Royal

Williams > benson..


So if you look at it this way.. He's probably giving up his #1 and #2 overall picks for your #1 Benson, Royal were maybe 6th round tops. River was probably a 3 or 4.

So as far as that goes you win there. I'd do the trade if your other wideouts are good, or you have a solid #1 still.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2010 Invision Power Services, Inc.