Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: a 4-3 defense
PackerChatters > PackerChatters > Draft Talk
mancl
This topic would have been better earlier but I didn't think of it.

Much of the focus of our discussion had been on getting players to fit the 3-4 defense. What if the Packers had kept a 4-3 What would the draft discussion have looked like.

We would still be discussing the D line but in different ways. There would be a need to develop a back up/ replacement to Pickett but we wouldn't be talking about taking Raji so high. There would have been discussion about quicker DT' like Ziggy Hood and Jerry later in the draft. Orapko seem to be a better bet at DE than at OLB.

There would be little discussion of linebackers and little discussion of D backs.

O line would still be a priority
ricky
mancl, why aren't we discussing who the Packers would draft if they were still playing 4-3? Because the Packers have decided to move to 3-4, and have hired Capers to make the transition.

My thought- let it go.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2010 Invision Power Services, Inc.