X   Site Message
(Message will auto close in 2 seconds)

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> Jason Whitlock article on Favre TT
fouristheman
post Nov 6 2009, 06:10 AM
Post #1


Rookie
**

Group: Members
Posts: 99
Joined: 6-August 06
Member No.: 241



http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/1032537...-Thompson-wrong

His rant is a bit much but his core point about TT not willing to surround Brett with the necessary talent is something I have believed since TT came to GB. He tried to build for the future at the expense of the present. Unfortunately, we are finding out his ability to build for the future isn't working either. Not trying to get Randy Moss harder was just stubbornness. Being a Packer fan is in my blood but it sure has been painful for the last several years.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
3 Pages V  < 1 2 3  
Start new topic
Replies (20 - 25)
LuvdaPack36
post Nov 7 2009, 05:54 AM
Post #21


Hall of Famer
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 8,942
Joined: 5-August 06
From: Shawnee, Kansas
Member No.: 111



QUOTE (Bob_Nelson @ Nov 6 2009, 11:08 PM) *
Why are we still debating this.

Committing to Rodgers after Favre waffled was the correct thing to do, period. And thats coming from a Favre fan.

All this does is provide a distraction to the real issue, the fact that Ted has had, since 2006, some pretty poor offseason's. This team has holes folks, and it isn't at QB.




I agree. Favre is done and over with. He is the least of our problems right now.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
stuffin
post Nov 7 2009, 05:37 PM
Post #22


Veteran
***

Group: Members
Posts: 667
Joined: 7-August 06
From: Jersey Shore
Member No.: 335



QUOTE (LuvdaPack36 @ Nov 7 2009, 08:54 PM) *
I agree. Favre is done and over with. He is the least of our problems right now.



I thought we were discussing the Whitlock article and not Favre?

But otherwise I agree.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
LuvdaPack36
post Nov 7 2009, 09:48 PM
Post #23


Hall of Famer
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 8,942
Joined: 5-August 06
From: Shawnee, Kansas
Member No.: 111



QUOTE (stuffin @ Nov 7 2009, 07:37 PM) *
I thought we were discussing the Whitlock article and not Favre?

But otherwise I agree.




I thought the Whitlock article was about Favre?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
66_Ray
post Nov 8 2009, 07:24 PM
Post #24


Pro Bowler
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,306
Joined: 19-October 06
From: Parts Unknown
Member No.: 1,025



QUOTE (LuvdaPack36 @ Nov 8 2009, 12:48 AM) *
I thought the Whitlock article was about Favre?

The guys article is spot on
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
BigBudman
post Nov 8 2009, 07:27 PM
Post #25


Pro Bowler
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,235
Joined: 5-August 06
From: Centerville, OH
Member No.: 115



QUOTE (66_Ray @ Nov 8 2009, 10:24 PM) *
The guys article is spot on


It is amazing to see so many who trumpeted is excellence when he was carving up Favre now call him a hack once he writes a pro Favre article. Very interesting.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
diesel
post Nov 8 2009, 08:12 PM
Post #26


Pro Bowler
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,553
Joined: 20-September 06
From: Stratford, Wi
Member No.: 878



QUOTE (BigBudman @ Nov 8 2009, 09:27 PM) *
It is amazing to see so many who trumpeted is excellence when he was carving up Favre now call him a hack once he writes a pro Favre article. Very interesting.

He has been a good writer for a lot of years. He is known and respected nationally. Criticizing Ted Thompson is still taboo around certain circles.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

3 Pages V  < 1 2 3
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 21st November 2009 - 11:20 AM