My Assistant
![]() |
Nov 5 2009, 12:06 PM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Moderator ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderator Posts: 2,941 Joined: 13-August 06 From: Defiance, Ohio Member No.: 448 |
who wins?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
Nov 5 2009, 01:37 PM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Veteran ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 816 Joined: 5-August 06 From: Orlando, FL Member No.: 114 |
Maxman,
I think we got a pretty fair deal here. Tough for me to go against either side of the deal, but I was once told by my fantasy mentor you should always get the best players in the deal...never settle for 3 for 1's or 2 for 1's. Get the studs. The studs in this case are Fitzgerald and Rivers. IMO. |
|
|
|
Nov 5 2009, 04:00 PM
Post
#3
|
|
|
Veteran ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 858 Joined: 7-December 06 From: Near St. Louis Member No.: 1,332 |
Larry Fitzgerald vs. Brandon Marshall
In this case I give Fitz +1.5 and Marshall -1.5. Philip Rivers vs. Carson Palmer I give Rivers a +.5 and Palmer a -.5. Frank Gore vs. --- +2. Getting Gore, a top 10 fantasy back who can play like a top 5, this is +2. ____________ 2 points for the team receiving Fitz/Rivers. 0 points for the team receiving Marshall, Palmer, and Gore. The ONLY way I'd accept this trade if I'm getting Marshall, Palmer, and Gore is two things, 1) I lack a true #1 RB and 2) I'm loaded at WR. If any of those options don't apply to you, I'm not doing the trade. If I'm the team getting Rivers and Fitzgerald. I do this trade in a heart beat as long as I have two backs that are capable of starting full-time. |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 20th November 2009 - 02:29 PM |