My Assistant
 |
|
Site Message
(Message will auto close in 2 seconds)
 Packers Therapy – Episode 127 Up., On Home Page |
 Oct 27 2009, 08:14 AM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Site Admin/Owner  Group: Root Admin Posts: 4,600 Joined: 4-August 06 From: Reno, NV Member No.: 5  |
This week Chris and Dave discuss the Green Bay Packers victory over the Cleveland Browns and look forward to the Big Game against the Vikings Sunday.
Packers Therapy Podcasts are sponsored by Green Bay Packer Nation. |
 |
 
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Replies
(1 - 3)
|
Oct 27 2009, 10:55 AM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Veteran Group: Members Posts: 153 Joined: 8-January 07 From: Charleston, SC Member No.: 1,544 |
Dave cracks me up. The sky is always falling!!! I mean sure the Vikes are a good team maybe even better than the Pack, but you act like we have absolutely zero chance to beat them. Have you been watching the same games I have? Despite the Pack's many flaws they've lost their two games by a combined 14 points. To division leaders no less. You act like the Vikes are the Steelers from the late 70's. Man, you must be miserable every time you have to watch the Green and Gold play. The cup is definitely half empty right Dave?!?! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/blink.gif)
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 29 2009, 08:16 AM
Post
#3
|
|
|
Pro Bowler Group: Members Posts: 1,118 Joined: 13-August 07 From: West Michigan Member No.: 2,927 |
Great podcast as usual guys, but I have to disagree with Chris' statement that the Vikings are better in every phase of the game. I'll take our DBs over the Vikes' any day. If the O-line can protect long enough for Rodgers to take advantage, we could see some big passing numbers for A-rod this Sunday.
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 5 2009, 09:07 AM
Post
#4
|
|
|
Veteran Group: Members Posts: 416 Joined: 2-November 06 Member No.: 1,081 |
QUOTE (MI_Cheesehead @ Oct 29 2009, 11:16 AM)  Great podcast as usual guys, but I have to disagree with Chris' statement that the Vikings are better in every phase of the game. I'll take our DBs over the Vikes' any day. That's a fair point about the relative strengths of the DBs. However, I wasn't thinking that specific: I was thinking offense, defense and special teams, not the positional groupings. Thought of that way, GB would have some advantages. But more abstractly I think those advantages are minimized. Thanks for listening and taking the time to reply. |
|
|
|
 |
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 21st November 2009 - 11:19 AM |
