Sign In
Register
Help
http://msn.foxsports...-Thompson-wrong
His rant is a bit much but his core point about TT not willing to surround Brett with the necessary talent is something I have believed since TT came to GB. He tried to build for the future at the expense of the present. Unfortunately, we are finding out his ability to build for the future isn't working either. Not trying to get Randy Moss harder was just stubbornness. Being a Packer fan is in my blood but it sure has been painful for the last several years.
Jason Whitlock article on Favre TT
#1
fouristheman 
- Veteran
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 114
- Joined: 06-August 06
Posted 06 November 2009 - 06:10 AM
MultiQuoteOther Replies To This Topic
#21
LuvdaPack36
- Hall of Famer
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 9,368
- Joined: 05-August 06
- Gender:Male
- Location:Shawnee, Kansas
- Interests:Golf, Family, Fishing, Football, Work and of course PACKERS FOOTBALL!
Posted 07 November 2009 - 05:54 AM
QUOTE (Bob_Nelson @ Nov 6 2009, 11:08 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Why are we still debating this.
Committing to Rodgers after Favre waffled was the correct thing to do, period. And thats coming from a Favre fan.
All this does is provide a distraction to the real issue, the fact that Ted has had, since 2006, some pretty poor offseason's. This team has holes folks, and it isn't at QB.
Committing to Rodgers after Favre waffled was the correct thing to do, period. And thats coming from a Favre fan.
All this does is provide a distraction to the real issue, the fact that Ted has had, since 2006, some pretty poor offseason's. This team has holes folks, and it isn't at QB.
I agree. Favre is done and over with. He is the least of our problems right now.
#22
stuffin
- Veteran
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 886
- Joined: 07-August 06
- Location:Jersey Shore
Posted 07 November 2009 - 05:37 PM
QUOTE (LuvdaPack36 @ Nov 7 2009, 08:54 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I agree. Favre is done and over with. He is the least of our problems right now.
I thought we were discussing the Whitlock article and not Favre?
But otherwise I agree.
#23
LuvdaPack36
- Hall of Famer
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 9,368
- Joined: 05-August 06
- Gender:Male
- Location:Shawnee, Kansas
- Interests:Golf, Family, Fishing, Football, Work and of course PACKERS FOOTBALL!
Posted 07 November 2009 - 09:48 PM
QUOTE (stuffin @ Nov 7 2009, 07:37 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I thought we were discussing the Whitlock article and not Favre?
But otherwise I agree.
But otherwise I agree.
I thought the Whitlock article was about Favre?
#24
66_Ray
- Pro Bowler
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 3,924
- Joined: 19-October 06
- Gender:Female
- Location:Parts Unknown
Posted 08 November 2009 - 07:24 PM
QUOTE (LuvdaPack36 @ Nov 8 2009, 12:48 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I thought the Whitlock article was about Favre?
The guys article is spot on
#25
Bud
- Pro Bowler
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 2,764
- Joined: 05-August 06
- Gender:Male
- Location:Centerville, OH
Posted 08 November 2009 - 07:27 PM
QUOTE (66_Ray @ Nov 8 2009, 10:24 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
The guys article is spot on
It is amazing to see so many who trumpeted is excellence when he was carving up Favre now call him a hack once he writes a pro Favre article. Very interesting.
#26
diesel
- Pro Bowler
-
- Group: Members
- Posts: 4,436
- Joined: 20-September 06
- Gender:Male
- Location:Stratford, Wi
- Interests:Blues music, Packers, Brewers , Bucks and The Badgers
Posted 08 November 2009 - 08:12 PM
QUOTE (BigBudman @ Nov 8 2009, 09:27 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
It is amazing to see so many who trumpeted is excellence when he was carving up Favre now call him a hack once he writes a pro Favre article. Very interesting.
He has been a good writer for a lot of years. He is known and respected nationally. Criticizing Ted Thompson is still taboo around certain circles.